Bridgewater Bank is one of several new entrants
on the Canadian Banking scene. It was born
out of a desire to satisfy Alberta Motor Association
(AMA) member requests for more services. "Our
board is comprised of members. In the association,
we have regional boards comprised of members
at large," O'Neill says. "They were
asking about chequing accounts and credit
cards. They started with credit cards and
an alliance with MBNA out of the States. Next
they bought a mortgage company. They quickly
realized they wanted to offer more services
and that is why the decision to start a bank
came about," Peter O'Neill, Bridgewater
Bank's COO, recounts. "So we bought a
mortgage company."
Bridgewater Bank's employees are primarily
based in Calgary. They have over 100 employees
including eight Business Development Managers
(BDMs) located across Canada in larger cities
including Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Toronto,
Ottawa, and Halifax. The sequence of events
that lead to the creation of Bridgewater Bank
began in March 1997 when PAFCO Mortgage Company
began a brief flirtation with mortgages in
Calgary, Alberta. In June 2000, in response
to their member's request for additional services,
the Alberta Motor Association purchased PAFCO
and changed the name to Bridgewater Financial
Services Ltd.
Following a two year bank charter application
process, the western based financial institution
received approval to operate as a chartered
bank and the legal name change to Bridgewater
Bank from the Canadian federal banking regulator;
Office of the Superintendent of Financial
Institutions (OSFI) in January 2006. The application
process was underway when O'Neill arrived.
Reasons for the long lead-time were twofold:
"Because we are member driven and represent
an ethical brand we operate with an abundance
of caution," O'Neill explains. "Second,
because we were one of the first companies
with an existing mortgage operation to approach
OSFI, it was probably felt they had to proceed
with caution. I remember a lot of conversations
we had around needing to inform the regulators
about our unique situation. It worked itself
out in the end though. When OSFI finally issued
our 'letters patent' document it was given
simultaneously with our order to commence
business. They are not typically issued together,
but we received both at the same time."
The new "bank" status allowed
Bridgewater Bank to evolve into a deposit
taking institution as a member of the Canada
Deposit Insurance Corp (CDIC). In May 2006
the bank sold it's first Guaranteed Investment
Certificate (GIC) through the AMA membership
stream. In November 2006 the first GIC was
sold to a national consumer audience through
their select Deposit Broker network.
Bridgewater Bank has two distinct customer
bases: Mortgages and GICs are sold nationally
across Canada (with the exception of Quebec)
via a select broker network and exclusively
to the Alberta Motor Association members through
'the AMA Financial sales network.'
According to O'Neill, Bridgewater Bank had
an installed base looking to expand revenue.
It is all based on the concept of ‘Internal
Organics.’ "Organic growth used to be
the big buzzword about 15 years ago,"
O'Neill explains. "It was all about taking
core competency and trying to find other industries
to bring those to. Banks have known about
'Internal Organics' for a long time; I spent
a lot of time in a major bank. There was a
machine that said we want you to do much more
business with your existing clients. Look
at Royal Bank. They have millions of clients.
Technically they have a bottomless well of
opportunities. So what if they have thousands
of employees, it would take forever to mine
their own database. In reality, if they turned
all of their sights inward why would they
want to expand outward?"
Big banks are not geared effectively for
intimate banking situations. "That is
why we exist," says O'Neill. I have been
on both sides-in a microbank managing $2 billion
in assets versus a major bank with hundreds
of billions in assets with access to international
markets and sophisticated machinery on the
treasury management side. One would imagine
they'd have the ability to shave pennies out
of the cost base and put a nice "no-dicker-sticker"
out on the streets. Something the average
Canadian would just say 'wow, thanks!' But
the reality is that there is so much imbedded
cost and infrastructure; its not unlike GMAC,
or Chevrolet, or Ford, in that every car they
put into the production line already has $1,800
to $2,000 worth of legacy costs attached to
it before you even put a bolt on it. The big
banks are like that. You've got all these
big branches, people, and equipment that they
have to keep paying for. Those costs don't
go away. We have very little of that. We are
a manufacturer with around 100 staff and we
still manage to have a national footprint.
It's a very tight machine."
Bridgewater employees seem to be motivated
by more than just profits. "Bridgewater
Bank wakes up every day because we want to
add value for our customers," says O'Neill.
"This is one of our main goals."
O'Neill is a realist when it comes toBridgewater
Bank. Technology innovations and near commodity
pricing for software to run the bank are other
areas where O'Neill feels his bank has an
advantage over the big banks. "In going
to 'bankland' one of the things we asked ourselves
is, 'Do we have the technology to meet regulatory,
reporting, operational, and administration
requirements?' O'Neill explains.
Bridgewater Bank selected Fincentric's Wealthview
banking platform to run its banking services
and Filogix Express for its underwriting software.
"Without these technologies, the bank
simply would not exist," O'Neill states.
He points out in reference to technology that
while the first thing he put in place was
people, technology is an important enabler
that allows employees to focus on superior
service delivery.
What he likes about Wealthview is that it
is basically a 'bank in a box.' "While
there are many companies that offer banking
software," he says. "Not many suppliers
offer what I consider the 'bank in the box'
concept. We wanted a product to support our
GIC products and scale up without any development.
Two suppliers fit the bill. We preferred Fincentric.
We understood them, I had known of them previously
and their solution actually works."
"The big banks are running on legacy
systems that require huge maintenance. Just
to add a new service can take 6-9 months.
I ran product management for a bank and can
assure you that every time we had a good idea-in
fact we had market-leading ideas-we found
that some small, nimble operation would have
it on the street within 30 days. This is pretty
frustrating when you are trying to be leading
edge and just about anybody can get in the
game before you. Now I'm on the other side
of the equation. Bridgewater Bank was first
to the market with 40 year amortizations and
first in the market with AIG (United Guarantee
Corp) as a third mortgage insurer."
Looking back, O'Neil is satisfied that Bridgewater
Bank achieved a lot in getting their bank
charter. His first piece of advice for anyone
thinking about following a similar path would
be that there is a lot to do to get a bank
ready. "The first thing that should be
done is to draw the map of what ought to be,"
he advises. "Figure out all the elements
that will have to come into play. Determine
the kind of portfolio leaders that add value
to the bank and bring credibility to the table.
We had to come up with the right leaders.
And most important, set yourself up from a
people perspective first." /